Brief
Report on the Development of the
Non-state Sector of the Chinese Economy
Download
Shanghai Flash N° 4/2005 pdf-version
The P.R China
didn’t encourage the existence of the non-state economy
until December 1978, when the 3rd Plenary Session of the 11th
Central Committee of the Party open the Chinese economy to private
initiative. In a traditional communist society, everything should
be owned by the state and shared by everybody. This concept was
extended to the extreme in the Great Leap Forward from 1958-1960
and again for the ten years starting with the Cultural Revolution
in 1966. To be engaged in a private company or to have a business
of one’s own was considered to be capitalistic. People were
supposed to draw a clear line from capitalism, in order to cut
off the ‘capitalistic tail’.
Changes took
place when Deng Xiaoping decided to open China to the outside
in the 1980s. At the beginning of the reform, however, the state
sector still remained dominant in China’s economy. One policy
of the reform, according to Deng Xiaoping, was to allow some people
to get rich first, which was reflected in one of his very famous
phrases, no matter it is a black cat or a yellow one, as soon
as it can catch mice, it is a good cat. Thus the first group
of private entrepreneurs emerged, expanding from the coastal area
to the Chinese hinterland. There was a word vividly reflecting
a typical phenomenon at the beginning stage of the development,
wan yuan hu, i.e, families who could make RMB 10,000 a
year. And the non-state sector started to take part in the development
of the China’s economy since then, firstly with free markets
of agricultural goods, then with other products as well. The development
took off with quite a fast pace that the state government didn’t
anticipate.
State vs
Non-state
Traditionally
the criteria China used to distinguish the enterprises was by
the ownership type, not by the size, which was followed by most
countries in the world. The concept of non-state sector didn’t
take into shape immediately.
The State
Statistical Office used to present data for seven different classes
of enterprise ownership: individual ownership, private ownership,
foreign ownership, joint ownership, shareholding corporations,
collective ownership, and state ownership. The last two types
are the vestiges of a socialist society on its way to communism
as expressed by the ownership of the state or the ownership of
its people. Very often, however, there was another frequently
used category as other types of ownership. Therefore information
was not uniformly available for these classifications for all
of the indicator of interest to analysts. With the further development
of the reform, the socialist stated owned economy switched to
socialist market economy, many changes have subsequently taken
place during the past 20 years, which make a distinction between
the different types of enterprise ownership even more vague. Take
as an example the reform of SOEs, some were closed down completely,
some were bought out, and some became shareholding corporations.
A mixed ownership has turned into a major form in the Chinese
economy of today. Meanwhile, because the state government has
loosened the restrictions to foreign investment in China, joint
ownership is becoming out of date, said by an experienced Chinese
consultant, a wholly foreign owned enterprise is more preferable
to foreign investors. What’s more, the central government
released another new regulation at the end
of 2004, enabling an existing WFOE to also be engaged in trading
activities. Though it still takes some time for the new regulation
to take effect, the move itself shows the intention of the Chinese
government to adjust its original economic structure so to get
close to international standards. All these changes meant that
actually the concept of enterprise ownership is developing into
a much simpler two categories from the original seven ones: state
or non-state.
The Chinese
government has started to apply international rules to distinguish
enterprises by their size. Nowadays there is therefore the concept
of large, small and medium sized enterprises. SMEs have been mentioned
more and more often since the 1990s. A department of Small and
Medium-Sized Enterprises was created in 1998, under the organisation
of the State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC), now the Ministry
of Commerce, to be in charge of all matters related to SMEs. In
2003, an updated provisional regulation was drawn up by several
state organisations to further clarify the criteria on the size
of SMEs (see annex).
Most of SMEs
are privately owned (with state owned SMEs of around 14.8% of
the total), including collective enterprises, town and village
enterprises, individual enterprises, private enterprises, Hongkong,
Taiwan, and Macaw enterprises and export processing enterprises.
SMEs are the major playesr in the non-state economic sector. One
could say to some extent, the development of SMEs is actually
reflecting the development of the Chinese non-state economy.
The role
of SMEs
In 1999, the
National People’s Congress made a considerable amendment
to the constitution, leading to the non-state economy being no
longer just a complement of the socialist market economy, but
a rather important component by its own right. A research on Chinese
non-state economy produced by the Shenzhen Comprehensive Development
Research Institution shows that the ratio of the *state economy
has dropped from 77% in 1978 to 25% in 1997, and the investment
has dropped from 83% in 1980 to 52% in 1997.
* In the research,
the state economy meant the SOEs. All the other types of ownership
enterprises such as collective ownership, town ownership, private
ownership were categorized the non-state economy, though not being
private in nature.
The growing
significance of SMEs in China’s economy is hard to ignore.
According to the statistics provided by the departments in charge
of SMEs, there are around 10 million SMEs in 2004, accounting
for 99% of the country’s total registered enterprises and
employing 75% of the labour force. 60% of the national industrial
output value and 40% of the national revenue same to have come
from the SMEs.
Besides their
overwhelming weights, SMEs are also pivotal to the current development
of the Chinese economy because of their flexibility and resilience,
its easy start of business, its potential to push the growth of
domestic demands, their role as a catalyst for the deepening of
industrial division of labour ( SMEs are the main destination
for workers laid-off from state-owned enterprises that re-enter
the workforce), etc.
Financing
the SMEs
Financing
is always a headache for SMEs. In the past, the finance needed
for the start-up was usually raised through indirect financing,
primarily from the local community or from
family members.
Financing by the community in the 1980s was often in the form
of the socialist township enterprise which gave a supplementary
protection in a yet unclear direction of development for private
companies. Retained earnings are another key source of financing.
With the recognition of the role of private enterprises in Chinese
development, state banks became also more open to them. They used
to be very generous when loaning money to SOEs because of their
government guarantees.
The central
government has realised the problem and the importance of SMEs
to the Chinese economy, measures have been taken to improve the
financial situation. For example, state-owned banks have been
advised to set up credit departments catering for SMEs. A unified
credit guarantee system is setting up to aid SMEs in their pursuit
for credit guarantee, more than 100 Chinese cities have established
credit guarantee institutions, which are expected to help guarantee
some US$ 4.8 billion of bank loans for the SMEs.
The VAT (Value
Added Tax) rate for small commercial firms has been cut down to
4%, and so on.
Support also
comes from some international organisations. In late 2001, CPDF,
a multi-donor to SME facility managed by the International Finance
Corporation (IFC) and the private sector arm of World Bank Group
(WBG), commenced operations. The core donors are Australia, Switzerland,
the UK and the IFC. CPDF was designed to respond to the Chinese
government’s Western Development Program. It has three major
programs: access to finance, capacity building and sustainable
development initiatives, and business enabling environment.
However these
measures are far from sufficient, not to mention the difficulties
encountered when implementing them into practical operations.
It is said that less than 1% of China’s small and medium
firms actually qualify to use the credit guarantee system, according
to the criteria set by the central responsible departments in
central government.
Situation
after the accession to the WTO
The Chinese
SMEs will face more intense competitions after China’s enter
into WTO. They face many problems for further development, in
addition to the difficult access to bank loans, their low hi-tech
level, outdated technology and equipment, and above all, weak
awareness of how to integrate themselves into the global market.
Another factor limiting SME’s development is the mindset
of their managers. The long tradition of family-based businesses
often has a negative impact on the further expansion of China’s
SMEs
However SMEs
were better positioned to adapt to the WTO economy other than
the SOEs, because they lacked the social, managerial, and financial
baggage of large state enterprises. On the other hand, SMEs can
take advantage of China’s WTO entry by further integrating
themselves into multinational companies’ supply chains,
providing parts and services for the world’s top 500 companies.
In this case, the flexibility and strong competitivity of small
firms make them more responsive partners of foreign companies
than large state owned enterprises.
The Chinese
government is thus making efforts to improve the policy environment
for the SMEs. Besides offering more financial support, the government
is opening more investment fields to small and medium firms. All
sectors that permit foreign investment are
also open
to private investment although restrictions remain in some sectors
such as the defence industry. In Shanghai, according to the Municipal
Development and Reform Committee, a new documentary consisting
of 38 new regulations on encouraging, supporting and guiding non-state
economic sectors is under discussion. It is considered to be the
most complete and systematic official documents compared with
the other more than 60 ones issued in the past.
It can be
foreseen that the Chinese SMEs will keep developing rather rapidly
and will play a more and more important role in a sustained growth
of the Chinese economy.
By SONG Yujia
Swiss Business Hub
Criteria
for Chinese Small and Medium Enterprises
Industry |
General
criteria for SMEs |
Criteria
for medium-sized enterprises |
Employees |
Sales |
Total asset |
Employees |
Sales |
Total
asset |
Industrial |
< 2,000 |
< RMB
300 million (or) |
< RMB
400 million (or) |
> 300 |
> RMB
30 million (and) |
> RMB
40 million (and) |
Constuction |
< 3,000 |
< RMB
300 million (or) |
< RMB
400 million (or) |
> 600 |
> RMB
30 million (and) |
> RMB
40 million (and) |
Whole
Sale |
< 200 |
< RMB
300 million (or) |
|
> 100 |
> RMB
30 million (and) |
|
Retail |
< 500 |
< RMB
150 million (or) |
|
>100 |
> RMB
10 million (and) |
|
Communication&
transportation |
< 3,000 |
< RMB
300 million (or) |
|
> 500 |
> RMB
30 million (and) |
|
Post
service |
< 1,000 |
< RMB
300 million (or) |
|
> 400 |
> RMB
30 million (and) |
|
Lodging,
F&B |
< 800 |
< RMB
150 million (or) |
|
> 400 |
> RMB
30 million (and) |
|
Issued by
the State Ministry of Commerce, the State Development and Planning
Committee, The State Ministry of Finance, and the State Statistic
Bureau
Feb. 19th, 2003
1.6.2005
Consulate
General of Switzerland
for business related matters, please reply: sha.vertretung@eda.admin.ch
|